Results

Total Results: 44 records

Showing results for "review literature".

Including results to external links from AHRQ Sponsored Research Studies.

41. PROJECT NAME (pdf file)
    qualityindicators.ahrq.gov/Downloads/Modules/PQI/PQI_Composite_Development.pdf
    April 07, 2006 - The general process for the Workgroup was 1) to review background material on the PQI and to provide … call with a facilitated discussion of the material and summary of the initial comments; and 3) to review … Kentucky Department for Public Health; Maine Health Data Organization; Maryland Health Services Cost Review

42. Themes from HCBS Expert Call Discussions (pdf file)
    qualityindicators.ahrq.gov/Downloads/Resources/Publications/2012/Appendix_1B_Details_of_Expert_Panel_Calls.pdf
    January 01, 2012 - in this section is also included in section I or II, but is repeated to provide a single place to review … Overall Validity Clarification of HCBS Population and Program Services In response to their review … ”  One panelist felt that the literature review has language in it that is outdated and may be of … She cautioned that this research is still undergoing peer review, but believed that it provided some … this section is also included in section I or II, but is repeated here to provide a single place to review

43. MEMORANDUM (pdf file)
    qualityindicators.ahrq.gov/Downloads/Modules/QI_Reporting/Model_Report1.pdf
    May 01, 2007 - These composites were created on the basis of substantial statistical analysis as well as expert review … indicators within the composites, since they are based on extensive statistical testing and expert review … included in each composite were determined, again, through a process of statistical analysis and expert review

44. I (pdf file)
    qualityindicators.ahrq.gov/Downloads/News/AHRQ_QI_Guide_to_Comparative_Reporting_v10.pdf
    June 30, 2009 - Review by an NQF technical advisory panel rated acceptable for comparative public reporting. … Review by an NQF technical advisory panel rated acceptable for comparative public reporting. … Review by an NQF technical advisory panel rated acceptable for comparative public reporting. … Review by an NQF technical advisory panel rated acceptable for comparative public reporting. … Review by an NQF technical advisory panel rated acceptable for comparative public reporting.